StockCentral :: Community

Join in on the discussion with other like-minded investors in our community forums. Learn about the fundamental investing methodology and participate in educational workshops in the Investing forums, stay up-to-date on StockCentral news and make suggestions to the StockCentral team in Central Square, and discuss your favorite stock or recent market news in our A-Z ticker-based forums.

Subject: LoJack (LOJN)
Prev Topic Next Topic
Note: You must be a StockCentral subscriber and logged in to post messages.
Author Messages

Robert Brooker
Boston, Massachusetts


07/27/2008 8:45 AM  

Is anyone in the StockCentral community following LoJack (LOJN)?  I am starting to study it.  While my analysis is far from complete, here are some aspects of the stock that I find intriguing:

1.  Company performance is heavily correlated with new auto sales and the stock price has been beaten down along with the rest of the auto sector.  It trades at a discount to book value and a 7.5 PE ratio based on trailing earnings.  I am looking at ways to buy into the auto sector with relatively low risk.  I've been intrigued by GM based on the market cap of 5% of revenue, but see risk on the liabilities side of the balance sheet (i.e. equity could be worthless).  LoJack may be a way to get an auto sector valuation with a lower risk than many of the alternatives.

2.  5-year average ROE on LOJN is 18.6% . HIstoric sales growth of 12.9% and historic earnings growth of 11.8%.  LoJack is a widely recognized brand name and, I believe, has strong customer goodwill associated with it.

3.  With debt-to-capitalization of 17.2%, it's not very highly leveraged, which lowers risk.

4.  Market cap of $112M means it is likely overlooked by most large investors.  Market cap is also less than revenue of $222M in 2007.

5.  There is some volatility to historic earnings, but I am growing more tolerant of some earnings volatility.  I was just reading The Warren Buffett Way (better late then never) and about Buffett being philosophically "85% Graham and 15% Fisher".  Fisher believed that volatility of earnings is OK as long as the average earnings growth over a period of years is attractive.  I think the argument makes sense  . . .  .the companies that can report steady consistent earnings growth are either in industries with low volatility, or (like GE under Welch) manage to artifically smooth earnings with one-time events.  Neither factor is critical to whether a company is a great company or not.

I welcome any comments, and may even test out the Stock Study upload feature in the beta for StockCentral Toolkit to share the Stock Study with the SC community.

Thanks, Robert

 

 

Note: You must be a StockCentral subscriber and logged in to post messages.



ActiveForums 3.7
 



Register today for a free 45-day trial!

 

Investment Club Tools Investor Advisory Service Historical data by Historical prices by Instant Stock Analysis by About ICLUBcentral Inc.
myiclubBadge.gif IASBadge.gif HemscottBadge.gif CSIBadge.gif TakeStockBadge.gif ICLUBcentralBadge.gif